| | UT1HZM > PACKET 12.02.15 18:34l 31 Lines 732 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 32712_UT1HZM
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Convers (was HELP!...)
Path: IZ3LSV<IK6ZDE<F1OYP<JH4XSY<IW0QNL<OK0NBR<OK0PBR<UT1HZM
Sent: 150212/1612Z 32712@UT1HZM.KREM.POL.UKR.EU BPQ1.4.60
>
> From: N1URO@N1URO.#CCT.CT.USA.NOAM
> To : PACKET@WW
>
> Jean et al;
> The established method of convers/chat is the ping-pong server system.
> This
> links via TCP/IP on port 3600 and has for decades. Since then others have
> tried
> to develop chat networks using NetRom for linkers. Why use a protocol that
> limits MTU to 236 bytes instead of the original chat system that uses 1500
> bytes per packet?
>
Is it really matter MTU size for application like chat where human typing
operation going?
Also where end-point user will be on-air (I'm hope) with AX.25 and still
with 236
or 255 paclen :)
Common packet chat system would be nice, but we have for years two
different:
WWC and BPQ-type chat's.
73, Sergej.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
