| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 05.08.08 01:57l 260 Lines 7552 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 23490_CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V3 392
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<PY1AYH<PY1AYH<CX2SA
Sent: 080804/2351Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:23490 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:23490_CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: PRESAT, NANOSAIL-D : Failure (Trevor)
2. Re: PRESAT, NANOSAIL-D : Failure (Mineo Wakita)
3. Re^2: PRESAT, NANOSAIL-D : Failure (Mineo Wakita)
4. FO-29 (WILLIAMS MICHAEL)
5. Re: FO-29 (Greg D.)
6. data pinouts of rigs diff? (Mr Jeffrey L Ross)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 19:04:13 +0000 (GMT)
From: Trevor <m5aka(AT)yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: PRESAT, NANOSAIL-D : Failure
To: AMSAT BB <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <950129.67546.qm(AT)web27203.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Sad to see the loss of those two Amateur Radio Cubesats,
PreSat
http://www.amsat.org.uk/iaru/formal_detail.asp?serial=120
and
NanoSail-D.
http://www.amsat.org.uk/iaru/finished_detail.asp?serial=115
I'm sure we'll see many more launch failures before Falcon eventually provides
a reliable service it's the nature of space flight.
Even 'reliable' launchers can still have a 1 in 10 failure rate.
73 Trevor M5AKA
--- On Sun, 3/8/08, Mineo Wakita <ei7m-wkt(AT)asahi-net.or.jp> wrote:
> From: Mineo Wakita <ei7m-wkt(AT)asahi-net.or.jp>
> Subject: [amsat-bb] PRESAT, NANOSAIL-D : Failure
> To: amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org
> Date: Sunday, 3 August, 2008, 10:14 AM
> No.TypNo Type Date LS Payload
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 3 1 Falcon-1 03.08.08 F Om Trailblazer / PreSat /
> Nanosail D / Celestis 07
> planned launches
>
> 4 2 Falcon-1 xx.xx.08 Om RazakSat 1 / Cubesats
> Falcon-1 xx.3Q.09 Om Argo
> Falcon-1 xx.4Q.09 Om (SpaceDev)
>
> Failures:
> 3: Stage separation failure (Version 1st flight, Failure)
>
> Launch Sites
>
> CC Cape Canaveral SLC-36A
> Om Omelek Island, Kwajalein, Marshall Islands
> Va Vandenberg SLC-3W
>
> Last update: 03.08.2008
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB(AT)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those
> of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur
> satellite program!
> Subscription settings:
> http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
__________________________________________________________
Not happy with your email address?.
Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at
Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:43:36 +0900
From: Mineo Wakita <ei7m-wkt(AT)asahi-net.or.jp>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: PRESAT, NANOSAIL-D : Failure
To: dave(AT)mynatt.biz
Cc: amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org
Message-ID: <CDC8F5B1FBF870ei7m-wkt(AT)asahi-net.or.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Please see more datails:
http://www.spacex.com/webcast.php
http://space.skyrocket.de/index_frame.htm?http://www.skyrocket.de/space/doc_ch
r/lau2008.htm
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:47:35 +0900
From: Mineo Wakita <ei7m-wkt(AT)asahi-net.or.jp>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re^2: PRESAT, NANOSAIL-D : Failure
To: amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org
Message-ID: <CEC8F5B28AAC16ei7m-wkt(AT)asahi-net.or.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Please see more datails:
http://www.spacex.com/webcast.php
http://www.skyrocket.de/space/doc_lau_det/falcon-1.htm
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 16:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: WILLIAMS MICHAEL <k9qho6762(AT)sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FO-29
To: amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org
Message-ID: <44784.59875.qm(AT)web82702.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: ANS-216 AMSAT Weekly Bulletins
"The transponder is very sensitive so please refrain from using high
power because 200 watt EIRP is more than enough."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
I gave a 579 report to K9CIS's 200mW in a CW QSO.
Yes, the FO-29 transponder is working very well. I normally have to back off
the power to the FT-847's minimum setting above 20 degrees elevation.
Mike
K9QHO
AMSAT 33589
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 18:52:28 -0700
From: "Greg D." <ko6th_greg(AT)hotmail.com>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FO-29
To: <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <BLU133-W63B4F1DB6287D34293BCEA9780(AT)phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I had a really nice pass earlier today (around 12:50 PDT, 05:50z). Called CQ
a bunch, but was never able to link up with anyone.
I noticed that my return signal changed volume sharply from time to time, and
found an FM conversation running in Spanish at the very bottom of the passband
(435.801 or so). No call signs that I heard, and the upper part of Mexico was
in the footprint, so perhaps our Taxi Cab problem was the cause. After they
were gone (out of the footprint) I had consistently strong reception, and was
able to hear myself down to about 4 degrees, before the bird faded out.
Great to have her back!
Greg KO6TH
----------------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 16:58:32 -0700
> From: k9qho6762(AT)sbcglobal.net
> To: amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] FO-29
>
> From: ANS-216 AMSAT Weekly Bulletins
>
> "The transponder is very sensitive so please refrain from using high
> power because 200 watt EIRP is more than enough."
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>
> I gave a 579 report to K9CIS's 200mW in a CW QSO.
>
> Yes, the FO-29 transponder is working very well. I normally have to back
off the power to the FT-847's minimum setting above 20 degrees elevation.
>
>
> Mike
> K9QHO
> AMSAT 33589
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB(AT)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_________________________________________________________________
Your PC, mobile phone, and online services work together like never before.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108587394/direct/01/
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:08:40 -0400
From: "Mr Jeffrey L Ross" <radiooperator(AT)comcast.net>
Subject: [amsat-bb] data pinouts of rigs diff?
To: "amsat" <amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org>
Message-ID: <002a01c8f643$fa8f5bc0$6501a8c0(AT)hamshackcomputer>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
hi folks, are the data pinouts of different rigs the same or are most of
them different?
anyone know?
my ft 857 seems to have a diff. pinout then the ft 8100.
If i have them send me another tnc cable, Im not sure what cable i need. or
if it will work when i get it.
I have a tnc pk 96 for 9600 baud.
I have a ft 857 rig (hopefully will copy 9600 fsk)
if not I have a ft 8100 (but steps are 25 khz.)
tks in advance
p.s. I think this still concerns sats as I"m trying to copy them still, just
need alittle help. tks
kc8gkf
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb(AT)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 3, Issue 392
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
