| |
CX2SA > SATDIG 29.11.08 06:25l 745 Lines 22818 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : 53130_CX2SA
Read: GUEST
Subj: AMSAT-BB-digest V3 619
Path: IZ3LSV<IK2XDE<HB9TVW<F4BWT<ON0AR<7M3TJZ<CX2SA
Sent: 081129/0420Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:53130 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:53130_CX2SA
From: CX2SA@CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA
To : SATDIG@WW
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Determining orbit number (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
2. Re: MMIC for LEO preamp? (RFI-EMI-GUY)
3. Re: SO-50 eludes me (Andrew Glasbrenner)
4. Re: LVB Tracker (WILLIAMS MICHAEL)
5. Re: Determining orbit number (Jeff Yanko)
6. Re: Determining orbit number (Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF)
7. I8CVS (WILLIAMS MICHAEL)
8. Re: I8CVS (STeve Andre')
9. For Sale Icom IC-820H, IC-AG35 70 cm preamp (Michael Tondee)
10. FS For Sale - VHF Polarphaser. UK only please. (Dave Aitch)
11. Re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 3, Issue 618 (Bill Dzurilla)
12. Re: I8CVS (Dave Guimont)
13. Re: Mode S thru roof? (Greg D.)
14. SO-50 eludes me: followup from the originator
(Mark Lunday, WD4ELG)
15. Re: I8CVS (w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxxx
16. Small tower (D. Mynatt)
17. Re: I8CVS (Edward Cole)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:02:13 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Determining orbit number
To: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <49304E45.4030007@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
But do the orbits whilst it is still attached to the launch vehicle count?
And do partial orbits count (i.e. if it is launched from a site just south of
the equator in a northerly direction the first eqx would be only
after a very small portion of an orbit) or only complete orbits?
Jeff Yanko wrote:
> If I recall correctly, a new orbit, or orbit number increase, occurs when
> the satellite crosses the equator from the southern hemisphere to the
> northern hemisphere.
>
>
> 73,
>
> Jeff WB3JFS
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:04:54 -0500
From: RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: MMIC for LEO preamp?
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <49304EE6.5080603@xxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I have always wondered why so much discussion around noise figure
ignores the application of a SINAD meter in tuning receiver system
preamplifiers? Does not the SINAD meter accomplish the same goal without
having to disable AGC etc?
--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"?
"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."
"Follow The Money" ;-P
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:10:11 -0500
From: "Andrew Glasbrenner" <glasbrenner@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: SO-50 eludes me
To: "AMSAT BB" <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <075D30029EBB4C50ADCC3F5834FDA431@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Let me point something out here. The PL tone on SO-50 or AO-51 does not
prevent QRM. It just makes it where you do not hear it. The offending signal
is still present at the satellite receiver, and will still block you out if
it is stronger than your signal.
Considering we have shut down several stateside Echolink nodes that thought
145.850 was a pretty good spot to operate, it's very important to have some
means of monitoring the uplinks. PL does a fine job of saving power, which I
suspect is it's primary purpose on SO-50, but it is actually detrimental to
preventing QRM on the uplink. Fortunately we identified these guys via
AO-27.
There are other effects of the PL that we have observed on AO-51 when
several legitimate users are in competition for the uplink. When collisions
occur, often none get through, and none of them know why because nothing
gets repeated so the situation continues. With an open uplink, all stations
can hear the logjam and hopefully enough stand down to unclog the uplink.
This is why we stress the importance of full duplex operation.
The issue is moot with SO-50 anyways...AFAIK the satellite is primarily
hardware driven. Considering it was an unexpected gift from the Saudis,
let's not look in the horse's mouth too much.
A simple way to solve this is to use U/V instead of V/U for future FM
satellites. SO-35 was a dream to operate, with a strong downlink easily
heard, and an uplink that swept itself clean due to Doppler shift.
73, Drew KO4MA
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:23:17 -0800 (PST)
From: WILLIAMS MICHAEL <k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LVB Tracker
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <225307.84919.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Renzo,
?
I'm using an old Gateway 333 Mhz computer that runs Windows 98.
?
SatPC32 runs?LVB tracker-rotor and tunes the FT-847 for Doppler correction.
?
?
73,
?
Mike
?
?
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:07:41 +0700
From: " Dirgantara R YF0EEE" <enggi1401@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb]? Fw:? Re: LVB tracker
To: <AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <004901c9516b$177824b0$36c4517c@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;??? charset="iso-8859-1"
----- Original Message -----
From: <i6kzr@xxxxx.xx>
To: "Dirgantara R YF0EEE" <enggi1401@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: LVB tracker
> Hi Mike,
> Which program are you using with LVB tracker?
>
> I at the moment use Predict for Linux.
>
>? ? ? ? ? ? Thanks, I6KZR Renzo
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: " Dirgantara R YF0EEE" <enggi1401@xxxxx.xxx>
> To: <k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>; <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 9:09 AM
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LVB tracker
>
>
> > hi Mike
> >
> >
> > thanks for the response, I want to try LVB tracker, just for now i have
> > KR-400 and KOPEAK rotator
> >
> > 73 de YF0EEE
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "WILLIAMS MICHAEL" <k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> > To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 9:16 AM
> > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: LVB tracker
> >
> >
> > Sir:
> >
> > I modified an old Wilson WR-500 rotor (azimuth) to work with the LVB
> > tracker.
> >
> > I believe any rotor could be homebrewed to work.
> >
> > GL
> >
> > Mike (K9QHO)
> >
> > AMSAT 33589
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 14:25:51 +0700
> > From: " Dirgantara R YF0EEE" <enggi1401@xxxxx.xxx>
> > Subject: [amsat-bb] LVB tracker
> > To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
> > Message-ID: <00c601c95061$69f34450$1c3d3a72@xxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > any body use LVB tracker use KR-500 and KR-400 rotator,
> > how about a performance and accuracy for elevasi and azimuth ?
> >
> >
> > 73 de YF0EEE
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:26:35 -0800
From: "Jeff Yanko" <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Determining orbit number
To: <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>, "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <C5F02E33BF6E460099565137A0373E1A@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
I was told that while the bird(s) is still attached to the rocket body the
orbital count increases to all objects by 1 by each passing of the equator
in the south to north movement. In most cases the bird separates from the
body well before the first orbit is completed, yet when it reaches the
equator on it's south to north move, orbit number 00001 is logged.
As for determining the orbit number with a launch site south of the equator
it would be the second south to north equatorial crossing after launch since
the first crossing wouldn't count since it was just lauched and hasn't
completed a whole, or near whole orbit or achived orbit.
Now here's a kicker. If a bird is launched from the southern hemisphere and
it headed in a southerly direction, towards the south pole it would cross
the equator south to north on its first equatorial pass but won't count as
an orbit until the next pass. Which would technically mean the bird would
have to orbit, say 1.25 to 1.5 times before the first "official" orbit is
logged.
73,
Jeff WB3JFS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF" <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 12:02 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Determining orbit number
> But do the orbits whilst it is still attached to the launch vehicle count?
> And do partial orbits count (i.e. if it is launched from a site just south
> of the equator in a northerly direction the first eqx would be only
> after a very small portion of an orbit) or only complete orbits?
>
>
> Jeff Yanko wrote:
>> If I recall correctly, a new orbit, or orbit number increase, occurs when
>> the satellite crosses the equator from the southern hemisphere to the
>> northern hemisphere.
>>
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Jeff WB3JFS
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:31:57 +0000
From: Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF <nigel@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Determining orbit number
To: Jeff Yanko <wb3jfs@xxx.xxx>
Cc: AMSAT-BB <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <4930553D.3060404@xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
No, it would cross the equator on a S to N direction around half an orbit
after launch.
Jeff Yanko wrote:
> Now here's a kicker. If a bird is launched from the southern hemisphere
> and it headed in a southerly direction, towards the south pole it would
> cross the equator south to north on its first equatorial pass but won't
> count as an orbit until the next pass. Which would technically mean the
> bird would have to orbit, say 1.25 to 1.5 times before the first
> "official" orbit is logged.
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:47:57 -0800 (PST)
From: WILLIAMS MICHAEL <k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] I8CVS
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <495999.7134.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I am just amazed.
?
It seems?like every time Domenico (I8CVS) gets on this BB and makes a post, I
am printing?a hard copy of what he has to say or printing?the link he refers
me to. This is followed by?a ritual of punching?holes and putting?this
valuable information?into a binder for? reference.?
?
I just wanted to let you know that somebody out here is?using?your
information.
?
Thank you Domenico!
?
Mike (K9QHO)
AMSAT 33589
?
?
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:50:51 -0500
From: "STeve Andre'" <andres@xxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: I8CVS
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <200811281550.51603.andres@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Friday 28 November 2008 15:47:57 WILLIAMS MICHAEL wrote:
> I am just amazed.
> ?
> It seems?like every time Domenico (I8CVS) gets on this BB and makes a post,
> I am printing?a hard copy of what he has to say or printing?the link he
> refers me to. This is followed by?a ritual of punching?holes and
> putting?this valuable information?into a binder for? reference.?
> I just wanted to let you know that somebody out here is?using?your
> information.
> Thank you Domenico!
> ?
> Mike (K9QHO)
> AMSAT 33589
Yeah. I keep them in machine readable form. I know I'll need a lot
of what he says at various points in the future.
Thanks Domenico for your contributions.
--STeve Andre'
wb8wsf en82
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:52:29 -0500
From: "Michael Tondee" <mat_62@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] For Sale Icom IC-820H, IC-AG35 70 cm preamp
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <6CFA370CA314454BB38C04765550E667@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I have a nearly perfect Icom IC 820-H for sale. Comes with hand mic and
manual. I do not have the original box. I would say this rig is an 8 out of
10. It's in great shape and the only reason I don't rate it 9 out of 10 is
that a previous owner switched out the N connector on the 70cm side for an SO-
239. I bought it used a little less than a year ago from a gentleman on this
list and now I've decided to go to an all in one HF and satellite radio. I'm
asking $450.00 for the radio. This includes shipping anywhere in the lower 48
states.
I also have an Icom AG-35 70 cm receive preamp for sale. I am asking 125.00
for it. This also includes shipping anywhere in the lower 48 states. If
someone would like the radio and preamp both I will sell them together shipped
for $560.00 Paypal only please. Contact me off list if interested. I will be
glad to provide pictures to any serious inquiries if needed.
Tnx and 73,
Michael, W4HIJ
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:15:18 -0000
From: "Dave Aitch" <dave@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] FS For Sale - VHF Polarphaser. UK only please.
To: "'AMSAT-BB'" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <01b401c9519e$6aec8d60$40c5a820$@xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
It's the OSCAR type with SWR meter, called a PH2/s.
Asking ?75:00.
Drop me a note for further information.
73, Dave.
AMSAT UK 5766
Portland. Dorset.
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:21:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Dzurilla <billdz.geo@xxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 3, Issue 618
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID: <969768.99020.qm@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sebastian,
I do not understand why requiring 2 different tones lessens QRM. If the
transponder is set to turn off after 10 minutes, why can't the regular 67 hz
tone be the trigger to turn on? Is it that bootleggers aren't smart enough to
send two different tones?
73,
Bill NZ5N
>
> I hope no one changes the tone requirement on SO-50. If
> you listen to
> AO-51 passes over the USA and compare it to an SO-50 pass
> you will
> know why - lack of QRM (as well as lack of users - but
> that's the same
> on most birds anyway).
>
> SO-50 is similar to working simplex terrestrially, except
> that you
> hear your downlink. There is no constant carrier as in the
> other FM
> birds as you mentioned. That does make it more difficult
> to tune,
> however (and again, not knowing the history of this bird),
> I'm sure it
> conserves battery power and transmitter life. I will take
> a guess and
> say that the 'turn on' code actually turns on the
> primary receiver,
> which again would conserve it's life.
>
*************
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:41:10 -0800
From: Dave Guimont <dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: I8CVS
To: k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Message-ID:
<20081128214112.RHJR7376.cdptpa-
omta05.mail.rr.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>It seems like every time Domenico (I8CVS) gets on this BB and makes
>a post, I am printing a hard copy of what he has to say or printing
>the link he refers me to. This is followed by a ritual of punching
>holes and putting this valuable information into a binder for reference.
>
>I just wanted to let you know that somebody out here is using your
>information.
>
>Thank you Domenico!
We are a multitude Mike.... I am neither a technician or an engineer,
and Dom has explained for years "what is happening" in the 28 years
I've been operating hamsats...
And he has NEVER failed to answer a question I might have..
We are fortunate to have him, and others; three of them live right
here in San Diego!!
73, Dave, WB6LLO
dguimon1@xxx.xx.xxx
Disagree: I learn....
Pulling for P3E...
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:17:12 -0800
From: "Greg D." <ko6th_greg@xxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Mode S thru roof?
To: <du7la@xxxxx.xxx>, <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <BLU133-W3EAEAAD8C00BB1DE4BAF3A9040@xxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Peter,
I think you will be disappointed with the results. The fluffy oak trees near
my house are practically opaque to 2.4 ghz signals, so I imagine that a solid
roof will be even worse. If there is space between the wood strips (vs a
solid wood decking), you might have some luck going just through the asphalt.
Water one thing that kills microwave signals, and wood is always wet.
(Concrete is another signal killer, in case that is another option...)
Greg KO6TH
> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:32:19 -0800
> From: du7la@xxxxx.xxx
> To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Mode S thru roof?
>
> I am finally getting around to mounting some antenna's in the attic and was
wondering if I should set up my ADIC 3731 with corner antenna?
>
> The roof does not have any insulation and as far as I can see only asphalt
type roofing shingles over wood.
>
> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Hope everyone had a wonderful Thanksgiving!
>
> 73 Peter
> KD0AA
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
_________________________________________________________________
Color coding for safety: Windows Live Hotmail alerts you to suspicious email.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_safety_11
2008
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:58:14 -0500
From: "Mark Lunday, WD4ELG" <mlunday@xx.xx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] SO-50 eludes me: followup from the originator
To: <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <001401c951ac$cbb74460$6325cd20$@xx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
THANK YOU ALL for the assistance, guidance, and suggestions/support. I
literally had dozens of email responses, and I want to again highlight how
helpful the AMSAT community (and this reflector) are for us newbies. It's
this Elmer-ing and help that makes me proud to belong to this hobby. FB,
OM's and YL's! 73
Mark Lunday
WD4ELG
wd4elg@xxxx.xxx
http://wd4elg.net
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:08:18 +0000
From: w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: I8CVS
To: k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: WILLIAMS MICHAEL <k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID:
<112820082308.1687.493079E1000F31610000069722155688840B9D04C999@xxxxxxx.
xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain
ditto - in fact at times I have to get out some of my books to follow him.
Rocket science is not easy to learn.
73 Bob W7LRD
--
"if this were easy, everyone would be doing it"
-------------- Original message --------------
From: WILLIAMS MICHAEL <k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> I am just amazed.
>
> It seems like every time Domenico (I8CVS) gets on this BB and makes a post,
I am
> printing a hard copy of what he has to say or printing the link he refers me
to.
> This is followed by a ritual of punching holes and putting this valuable
> information into a binder for reference.
>
> I just wanted to let you know that somebody out here is using your
information.
>
> Thank you Domenico!
>
> Mike (K9QHO)
> AMSAT 33589
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:56:47 -0700
From: "D. Mynatt" <dave@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Small tower
To: "AMSAT-BB" <amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <D67D783C674D4422BDBEB0331A265A2B@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Anyone in Colorado have a 18-25 ft self-supporting tower for sale? Looking to
mount 2m and 70cm M-Squared antennas.
Dave // KA0SWT
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:46:15 -0900
From: Edward Cole <kl7uw@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: I8CVS
To: amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx
Cc: WILLIAMS MICHAEL <k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Message-ID: <200811290246.mAT2kFFr034151@xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Yes, I can count on Domenico to correct my math whenever I chose to
atempt technical subjects.
Obviously an intellegent an educated gentleman.
73, Ed - KL7UW
At 02:08 PM 11/28/2008, w7lrd@xxxxxxx.xxx wrote:
>ditto - in fact at times I have to get out some of my books to
>follow him. Rocket science is not easy to learn.
>73 Bob W7LRD
>
>--
>"if this were easy, everyone would be doing it"
>
>-------------- Original message --------------
>From: WILLIAMS MICHAEL <k9qho6762@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
>
> > I am just amazed.
> >
> > It seems like every time Domenico (I8CVS) gets on this BB and
> makes a post, I am
> > printing a hard copy of what he has to say or printing the link
> he refers me to.
> > This is followed by a ritual of punching holes and putting this valuable
> > information into a binder for reference.
> >
> > I just wanted to let you know that somebody out here is using
> your information.
> >
> > Thank you Domenico!
> >
> > Mike (K9QHO)
> > AMSAT 33589
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>_______________________________________________
>Sent via AMSAT-BB@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Sent via amsat-bb@xxxxx.xxx. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
End of AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 3, Issue 619
****************************************
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
