| |
VK2AWZ > SYSOPS 29.08.12 10:04l 20 Lines 923 Bytes #999 (0) @ WW
BID : C20124VK2AWZ
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: Please note! (UT1HZM)
Path: IZ3LSV<IW0QNL<JH4XSY<JE7YGF<VE3UIL<VK6ZRT
Sent: 120829/0732Z @:VK6ZRT.#BUN.#WA.AUS.OC #:24233 [Boyanup] $:C20124VK2AWZ
From: VK2AWZ@VK6ZRT.#BUN.#WA.AUS.OC
To : SYSOPS@WW
As a frequent sender of PMail, I find that if one can put up with an SP
being slower than snail mail, or never getting there at all. I put it up
as @WW or a bulletin @ww, as it will arrive faster than a speeding train!
I think the trouble is that many BBS's do not have a path to my
recipients, and if a BBS lists all of his "no route to"? it is extensive
and sometimes outnumbers the number of normal daily bulletin headers
received.
Personally my SP's don't have anything of a really personal nature, so I
don't care who reads them. If secrecy is necessary I muse Email.
I think too if you are accepted as a Winpac Telnet user, the BBS
sets you as having BBS privileges, for it to work properly, which again
voids secrecy of the old RF Pmail systems?
73 - Dave, VK2AWZ @ VK@ZRT
Message timed: 17:32 on 2012-Aug-29
Message sent using WinPack-Telnet V6.80
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
