| |
IW2OHX > BPQ 10.06.25 18:04l 39 Lines 1022 Bytes #296 (0) @ WW
BID : 55775_IW2OHX
Subj: Re: LoRa "Packet" port on BPQ32
Path: IZ3LSV<DB0ERF<DK0WUE<PD0LPM<VE3CGR<PA8F<PI8LAP<IW2OHX
Sent: 250610/1547Z 55775@IW2OHX.ILOM.ITA.EU BPQ6.0.24
Hi Chris,
I do agree.
It's good for backbone links as well.
With the configs I am using, the transfer rate is comparable with
2400/4800 bps of the old Packet Radio tncs.
The range should be longer with less watts.
Marco
73 de iw2ohx
On Tue, 10 Jun 25 12:03:00 Z
KQ6UP wrote:
> R:250610/1234Z 29877@GB7OSW.#16.GBR.EU LinBPQ6.0.24
> R:250610/1234Z 44876@VE3CGR.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24
> R:250610/1233Z 14544@VE3QBZ.#SCON.ON.CAN.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24
> R:250610/1233Z 12846@N6CTA.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24
> R:250610/1231Z @:GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO #:34490 [Caterham Surrey GBR]
> R:250610/1205z @:AA6HF.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM [Palm Springs] $:SXN2RP_KQ6UP
> R:250610/1203z @:KQ6UP.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM [Grand Terrace, CA] DP6.00
> $:SXN2RP_KQ6
>
> From: KQ6UP @ KQ6UP.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM (Chris)
> To: BPQ @ WW
>
> I have played with this and it works well. Alas,
> I don't have any neighbors within range to play
> with this tech at this point. It would be good
> for a backbone link.
>
> -73 de Chris KQ6UP
>
>
>
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
